Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
![]() | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: High level of misinformation being added to her page, evident from the fact that the subject of the article itself has been banned from WP for vandalism, so instead she asks her supporters to add bogus information onto her page such as the fact that she's leftist/centrist and that she enjoys gelato. A majority of these edits are performed by IP addresses. ~eticangaaa (talk) 03:31, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Still not seeing a lot of reverting. Daniel Case (talk) 01:04, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:45, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:45, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Sush150 (talk) 05:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content, and sockpuppetry. Richessehonk (talk) 09:02, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. Hotwiki (talk) 10:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. Hotwiki (talk) 10:35, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent campaign by multiple IPs. Mutt Lunker (talk) 10:40, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of repeated IP vandalism (over a period of over 3 years) 38.42.65.129 (talk) 10:59, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
+1 Reason: High level of IP vandalism for 3 years. Multiple IPs (47.229.171.222, 172.56.169.121, 212.114.251.53, 12.245.61.70, 32.142.50.118, 50.207.235.195, 97.68.255.154) have launched a persistent campaign over years 38.42.65.129 (talk) 13:00, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like it hasn't been vandalized much since last September or so. Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: War of edits by a member with an IP address. Incall talk 10:59, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A few days semi-protection is hopefully enough to let the IP-hopper read the argumentation that I give for the removal of its unsourced edits. IP is now cranky and moving towards PAs. The Banner talk 11:18, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Controversial topic, has been highly edited Wcamp9 (talk) 12:29, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like little vandalism, and the editors on the page taking care of it. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 12:39, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption from an IP hopper, claiming "Indian victory" and pushing Ahir (social group) bravado. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:40, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 12:47, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:05, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 12:54, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 1.236.144.49 (talk · contribs). for 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 13:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 13:59, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Both a registered user and several IP addresses keep removing cited information from this article. The issue revolves around a section where Centrica announced their support for the project in the early days. Through edit summaries, and on the registered users' talk page (Jamessutcliffe), I have asked they they do not remove the information, but update the article to state that Centrica supported it at the start, but now do not because of whatever the reason is that they have changed their minds. At least three other users (Bored kittycat, TheM1sty, and im really bad at this) besides myself, all agree the information should be retained and amended in the prose to reflect the now lack of support.
Thanks for considering this. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 14:31, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-Protection: That IP sockpuppet is at it again, adding unsourced material. That page will need protection from them. BattleshipMan (talk) 15:10, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor keeps removing information from lead without participating in talk page discussion. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:40, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Edit warring / content dispute. Valorrr (lets chat) 16:43, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism Farcazo (talk) 20:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: genre warring by several MariaJaydHicky's IP socks. --Blueberry72 (talk) 21:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit war by lableakers. Ixocactus (talk) 21:25, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2600:1700:3A20:D7E0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. For a week. Daniel Case (talk) 02:45, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Edit war in the UK section. The section keeps being replaced with the assertion that "There are no clothing laws in the UK". First instance at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clothing_laws_by_country&diff=1285216953&oldid=1256740048 CiceroYuletide (talk) 21:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:34, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 00:47, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits since March, and not a primary topic in the current conflict. Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of meatpuppetry and IP vandalism following viral article and social media post about edits to the page Richessehonk (talk) 02:03, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing a lot of it following the most recent blockings. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 02:11, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 80.82.62.98 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ad Orientem. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 02:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 02:25, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs since 22:09, 17 April 2025. Alith Anar 02:28, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:07, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – All recent history is WP:LTA/BTSZ. Leijurv (talk) 03:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP users. Red Shogun412 (talk) 03:47, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP-hopping vandal --Altenmann >talk 03:50, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent vandalism by new and unregistered/IP users. See the page revision history for many obvious examples. Iltjp (talk) 04:00, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of unsourced teams. Vestrian24Bio 04:35, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shadow4dark (talk) 05:13, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Various IPs continually change active team despite hidden note to not do so without a reliable source. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 06:30, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Unprotection: Removal of PC. The page is indef, so it is redundant. (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:53, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Because there is no need for the protection in the first place. 2601:243:D01:1F20:8026:3D95:F6C0:F7B2 (talk) 20:34, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Here's the history before its protection. (CC) Tbhotch™ 21:03, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Looks like the protection is serving its purpose quite well. The IP should use the WP:EDITREQUEST system if they wish to make changes. Sergecross73 msg me 23:17, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected per all the above. Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer nesscary because it has been 3 months since someone did disruptive editing on the page back in January, and I would like to see this un-protected like the other "Sonic" films by Paramount.
- This is incorrect, it is protected due to extensive disruption. Strongly against this. Sergecross73 msg me 20:53, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Have you considered that the lack of disruption might be because of the protection? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 02:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected per above. Daniel Case (talk) 03:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Have you considered that the lack of disruption might be because of the protection? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 02:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.