Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log

Featured content: Featured articles Featured lists Featured pictures Featured topics Featured list tools: Featured list criteria Featured list candidates Featured list removal candidates Featured list statistics Wikipedians by promoted featured list nominations Today's featured list This month's queue TFL submissions TFL statistics Featured lists that have appeared as TFL Featured lists yet to appear as TFL Featured list log Random featured list Former featured lists Removal candidates log

This is a log of featured lists from Wikipedia:Featured list candidates, with the most recent at the top. Discussions about unsuccessful nominations are located in the failed log.

Candidacy discussion about lists promoted in this calendar month is being placed at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/April 2025. Summary logs of articles promoted by year are also maintained; the most recent log is at Wikipedia:Featured lists promoted in 2025.

Full current month log

view - edit - history

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Hey man im josh via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC) [1].

---

List of World Heritage Sites in Oman

Nominator(s): Tone 15:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Oman has 5 sites on the main list and 7 tentative sites. Standard style. The list for Belgium is already seeing some support so I am adding a new nomination. On a side note, I've had a discussion with @Moxy: about the sticky header parameter in the tables, which is nice for longer lists, but seems incompatible with the table style that I am currently using for these lists. It works for List of World Heritage Sites in Canada but messes up the first column in the table which is now bold, whereas it was not before. Suggestions welcome, I'd like to keep them consistent. Tone 15:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Image review from Arconning

• File:Bahla Fort.jpg - CC BY 2.0
• File:World Heritage Grave Al Ayn Oman.JPG - Public Domain
• File:Boswellia sacra in Wadi Dowkah (Dhofar).JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:FalajDaris.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Qalhat, mausoleo di Bibi Maryam, xiv secolo, 08.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Al Rustaq Fort (2) (27255509348).jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
• File:كوريا موريا - panoramio (1) retouched.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Dimaniyat Islands 2.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Ras al Hadd.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0, source link needs to be fixed
• All images have alt text and are relevant to the article, here are my comments. Arconning (talk) 10:40, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

  Thanks! What do you suggest for Ras al Hadd image? I was not the one who uploaded it. Remove from the list? Tone 12:46, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

  @Tone You should probably find an archive link to the source link provided within the image. :) Arconning (talk) 12:59, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

  Ah, I found another image which should have the appropriate license. Tone 14:04, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

  Pass, image review. Arconning (talk) 12:47, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

IntentionallyDense

Source review

• Sources are consistently formatted. Only thing I would change is adding a wikilink for Times of Oman
• Add publication date for https://timesofoman.com/article/2183867/Oman/Tourism/Travel-Oman-Visit-Al-Hazm-Castle-in-Rustaq
• I spot checked the sources and found no issues.
• The sources are appropriately reliable for the topic.

Please ping me when you have made the suggested changes or if you have any questions. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 05:57, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

@IntentionallyDense: Done, thanks! Tone 08:14, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Pass for the source review. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 17:59, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Support, passes criteria 2. and 6. If you are able to then please add images for listings in the tentative list which currently do not have images. Easternsahara (talk) 14:19, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! I checked if there is any useful image for those two tentative sites but found nothing. Tone 09:37, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

History6042

• Lists should be sorted alphabetically I think.
• Please make dates in references consistent.
• Please make "The forts of Rostaq and al-Hazm" sort as "Forts of Rostaq and al-Hazm"
• Should the tentative list be added to the map?
• Why are some of the names transliterated differently than the articles that they link to?
• Maybe Aflaj shouldn't be in italics, I am not sure about this though.
• Ping when done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 18:47, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

  @History6042: Hm, I am not sure about your comments. The list is always set up chronologically, by the year of (first) inscription, but sortable. Which dates in references are not consistent? Looks fine to me. As for the forts and aflaj, I am using official names and style as per source so changing it would be at odds. However, wikilinks direct to the spelling used in the corresponding articles. Tentative lists are never on the map, just the main sites. Cheers! Tone 08:42, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

  For example, reference 3 uses mdy dates while reference 2 uses dmy. The others problems I brought up are no longer issues because you explained why they shouldn’t be done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 11:58, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

  @History6042: right, that one was off, fixed now, thanks :) Tone 13:02, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

  Support. History6042😊 (Contact me) 17:57, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Hey man im josh

All looks good to me, so I'm going to go ahead and support. Hey man im josh (talk)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:35, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Hey man im josh via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC) [2].

---

List of Saturday Night Live guests (U–Z)

Nominator(s): Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 20:15, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

In honor of SNL's 50th anniversery I wanted to get promote some SNL content. This list wasn't nearly as tough as I thought it would be and it only took me a few days. I picked it as it was the shortest of the SNL guest lists. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 20:15, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "Saturday Night Live (SNL) is a late-night sketch comedy and variety show created by Lorne Michaels" - I would add the word "American" after "is a". Can't assume that everyone knows its country of origin (even mentioning NBC might not help people in other countries if they aren't clued up on US networks) Done
• "A typical episode of SNL will feature a single host" => "A typical episode of SNL features a single host" Done
• "Candice Bergen was both the first female host in November 8, 1975, as well as the first " => "Candice Bergen was both the first female host in November 8, 1975, and the first " Done
• Any reason why Ukrainian Chorus Dumka of New York is at the bottom of the U list rather than in the correct place in alpha order? Done
• Reginald VelJohnson and Matt Vogel don't sort correctly in the V list Done
• Xzibit's name is spelt wrong Done
• Why are The Whiffenpoofs in the Y list?
  • They were listed as the Yale Whiffenpoofs but I changed it for consistency with the source.
• Todd Zeile is not in the correct place alphabetically in the Z list Done
• Add some images.....?
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:46, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: I have adressed the issues however what images should be added? Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 22:26, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Did any of these people do something notable during their appearance? Or appear lots of times? Or anything like that.....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

• One more comment: Frank Zappa's entry now says "Banned from future appearances". As Zappa has been dead for more than 30 years I doubt very much he would be making any future appearances anyway...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:04, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

  How would you propose to list it? Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

  I would suggest "banned from further appearances after [whenever]" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:47, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

  changed Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:08, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: just following up, have all your problems been addressed? Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:35, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

  I'll check. You have made a lot of changes since I last looked -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:05, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

More comments

• Lead image caption is not a sentence so doesn't need a full stop
• Morgan Wallen note is not a sentence so doesn't need a full stop
• Steve Whitmire note is not a sentence so doesn't need a full stop
• Walter Williams note is not a sentence so doesn't need a full stop
• In the lead you say ""Cameo", which is for a person who has appeared on the show but did not act as host or musical guest at any given time.", yet there are people with a tick in the cameo column who did serve as either host or musical guest.....?
• I still think it would be nice to add some images of actual people on the lists, maybe those with something in the notes column......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:08, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

  I added a few images and changed the punctuation. As for the cameo list. Some people have appeared on episodes they didn't host for example Christopher Walken hosted 7 times but also appeared in the cold open of a season 49 episode see [3] Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 07:29, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 07:29, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

  OK, in that case I think you need to change the wording of "appeared on the show but did not act as host or musical guest at any given time." Maybe just remove the last four words..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:29, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: done Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 08:34, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:28, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Oppose I know there have been multi-part lists before that have been nominated separately, but I am uncomfortable with a few letters of the alphabet being promoted to FL while the rest of the list is unimproved. There are not six independent lists here, but one that just happens to be subdivided for length reasons.

• Moreover, List of Saturday Night Live guests has the actual introductory content, which in most cases would be the lead or introductory sections for the list that should also be FL quality. The lead for this subpage just copy-pasted the lead from that. Just because there was enough content to split the list members on separate pages doesn't mean 1/6 of the tabular material should get the star by itself.
• This is one of the least informative lists I've ever seen nominated here. It's just names and a checkmark. At the very least I'd expect the year(s) of appearance to be included. It's not much better than List of Saturday Night Live episodes (seasons 1–30) and List of Saturday Night Live episodes (season 31–present), which fit all the hosts and musical guests and more info on just two pages. I guess being together in alphabetical order is nice, but when in letter-based tables, sortable columns are kind of worthless. Reywas92^Talk 00:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

I'll see about adding notes and dates columns, though their might be a sourcing problem with it. As for your first point. It seems quite in-actionable. Just because one sublist is improved doenst mean the others magically get better. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 00:23, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Just because one sublist is improved doenst mean the others magically get better. Exactly. I do not want to give out a star when 5/6ths of the content is unimproved. It's entirely arbitrary that this is the U-Z list. Why not merge them all into one long page that's sortable in a useful manner? Or have three pages instead of six since this one is in fact somewhat short? Reywas92^Talk 00:58, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

This seems inactionable. Would you promote List of SNL episodes 1-30 since 31-present isn’t at the same standard? Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 08:12, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

You've added "Banned from future appearances" to Neil Young, but the source does not support that assertion. Reywas92^Talk 01:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

@Reywas92: I hope to add a first appearence column but I cant find sources for all list entries could I list the episode under MOS:PLOTCITE? Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:53, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Yes. Reywas92^Talk 17:01, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

@Reywas92: It took me a few days but I have added a dates coloumn Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 07:00, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Source review from TheDoctorWho

Figure I'd go ahead and knock this out for you:

• Ref 1: isn't asking for a paid subscription from me?
• Ref 7: a WP:VALNET source, is there anything better available?
  • Cut
• Ref 10: VIDEO --> Video Done
• Ref 20: Missing an author Done
• Ref 24: Any reason you're citing the Peacock website rather than just the specific {{Cite episode}}?
  • I'm not citing the episode I'm citing the listing
• Ref 31: isn't asking for a paid subscription?
• Ref 50: pipe the link to just Biography
  • Not done per WP:NOTBROKEN
• Ref 53: Another MovieWeb
  • Replaced
• Ref 66: Link Variety Done
• Ref 86: Another where we're not citing the actual episode? Per above
• Ref 119: Same as above
  • Same as reason I don't cite the episode with the various hosted clips.
• I'd suggest running some general scripts from date formatting cleanup, dumb quotes, and title/sentence case Done

TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:27, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

@TheDoctorWho: Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:36, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

@OlifanofmrTennant: from NOTBROKEN: However, it is perfectly acceptable to change it to Franklin D. Roosevelt if for some reason it is preferred that "Franklin D. Roosevelt" actually appear in the visible text - I'd say its preferred for uniformity in formatting of references (i.e. you use The Guardian not theguardian.com; Entertainment Weekly not ew.com) TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:54, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

@TheDoctorWho: Done Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:36, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Great work, source review passes! TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:30, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Hey man im josh

Review is based on this version of the page.

• Frank Zappa was banned after for SNL after acting unprofessionally. – Banned after for SNL doesn't really make sense, seems you were trying to say something else?
• Ref 1 – "Love Love" is supposed to be "Matthew Love"
• Ref 3 – Note as subscription required
• Ref 4 – Missing date
• Ref 8 – Add James Andrew Miller as an author
• Ref 8 – Note as subscription required
• Ref 16 – Note as subscription required
• Ref 27 – Note as subscription required
• Ref 54 – Note as subscription required
• Ref 59 – Note as subscription required
• Ref 60 – Note as subscription required
• Ref 75 – Wikilink American Songwriter
• Ref 76 – Yale Bulletin & Calendar exists as a redirect instead of simply linking "Yale"
• Ref 91 – Note as subscription required
• Ref 98 – Note as subscription required
• Ref 99 – Note as subscription required
• Ref 100 – Note as subscription required
• Ref 115 – Missing date

Please ping me when you reply. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

@Hey man im josh: Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:02, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

@OlifanofmrTennant: There's an error with ref 115. I believe that's probably related to an attempt to add the date? Hey man im josh (talk) 18:09, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

@Hey man im josh: fixed Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:52, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Support based on reference formatting. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Vestrian24Bio

@OlifanofmrTennant:

• Add a language varaint template. Done
• Instead ticks for appearances, consider replcing it with no. of appearances as each (Host, Musical guest and Cameo). For empty cells in these three add the {{N/A}} template as well.
• Also, consider adding a Latest appearance or Recent appearance column; only for guests with multiple appearances.
• For the "As the voice of [...]" notes, I think they should instead be in Cameo column as {{Efn}} notes. Also, consider adding similar notes to other cameo appearances as well explaining what the cameo was; only where it applies which should exclude guests welcoming a new five-timer.
  • Problem is with this and the above two is it would possible lead to some WP:OR issues some of the sources just say "X appears on day" not "X appeared on day and did Y. They returned Z times on other day". As for the voice of EFN I worry that it would reduce the value of the notes column and make the cameo column more cluttered
• Also, what's the initial sort order? assuming it's alphabetical order, which it should be...
  • Ukrainian Chorus Dumka of New York should be placed between Bob Uecker and Carrie Underwood. Done
  • The White Stripes should be placed between Forest Whitaker and Betty White. Done
  • The xx should come before Xzibit. Done
  • Last four of Y table should be: Young Jeezy, Young Thug, Neil Young, Paul Young. Done
  • Todd Zeile should come between Frank Zappa and Renée Zellweger. Done
• Ref 81 - SB Nation is an unreliable source.
  • SB Nation is owned by Vox Media and I know it has been used in FLs before though off the top of my head I cant recall any.

Vestrian24Bio 12:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

@Vestrian24Bio: Questions? four Olliefant (she/her) 20:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

All good, Support. Vestrian24Bio 04:31, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98

I examined your article last night and only have a few suggestions.

• Paragraph 2, sentence 2: "On occasion" should be followed by a comma.
• With regards to the tables, these are only my personal preferences. I prefer it when sequential tables are the same width; I think it looks much more uniform. If this were my article, I would set each table to a uniform width (say, 70%). Additionally, I would specify that the columns (especially the Host, Musical guest, and Cameo columns) be of uniform width as well, because the contents of those columns are only checkmarks. You could specify that those three columns be of a specific width, or set each table to have the same parameters (for example, Performer=30%, etc.).
• I would also suggest removing the "Notes" columns from tables where there are no notes, as empty columns look unusual. The column can always be re-added in the future if a note needs to be added.

Unlike the editor above, I see no reason to not promote one article in a series even if the other articles do not merit it. What that tells me is that the rest of the series should be brought up to the same quality as this one. Even if all six were ready for FL nomination, it's not like they could all be submitted at the same time. There is nothing wrong with promoting one, taking the improvements suggested here and applying them to the other articles, and then promoting them one at a time as well.

Please let me know if you have any feedback! Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:09, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: done Olliefant (she/her) 17:45, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

OlifanofmrTennant, the tables are uniform now, so I will Support. If you don't want them to stretch out the full width of the screen, you can set the width (ie. 70% will stretch the table out to only 70% of the screen's width). Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:34, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:28, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Hey man im josh via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC) [4].

---

List of Michelin-starred restaurants in Vancouver

Nominator(s): History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:54, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because it is the same as my other nominations. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:54, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Arconning

• Image caption says "1 star", body says "one star", I'm guessing both are accepted styles though I would suggest for the sole usage of one of these to maintain consistency.
• Specify which cuisine Kissa Tanto is. It is mentioned as Japanese by Michelin in one source, then Fusion in the other, though all of them mention it as a fusion of being Japanese-Italian. Could add a note here, Ex: Fusion would be the text under "Cuisine", then add a note clarifying it as Japanese in reference 7 then Fusion in reference 11 but both sources also mention it being Japanese-Italian fusion.
• Use dmy dates as it's topic is focused on Canada.
• References 7, 8, 10, and 13 need archive links.
• Reference 3 and 6 should have CNN wikilinked.
• References 7, 11, and 13 should have Michelin Guide wikilinked.
• References 8, 10, and 14 should have Vancouver Sun wikilinked.
• "(which will be added in 2025)", as Wikipedia is an encyclopedia this would be outdated information soon once it is added. Please specify the dates somehow, similar to the usage of "As of" in a statement.
  • My comments so far. Ping me once done.Arconning (talk) 12:26, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

  Done, except the exact date of the Quebec guide is unknown. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:03, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

  @Arconning, forgot to ping. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:12, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

  @History6042 The Quebec section still needs to be fixed, see Wikipedia:As of#Precise language. Arconning (talk) 00:30, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

  @Arconning, as it isn't currently reviewed I have just removed it. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:33, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

  Support. Arconning (talk) 00:35, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

OlifanofmrTennant

• "Vancouver is one of three regions Michelin reviews in Canada, alongside Toronto... and Quebec" like all of Quebec? or a specific part
• Section labeled "Lists" but I count one
• Michelin shouldn't be in all caps in refs 7 and 12
• Lead image needs alt text
• The lead seems too boilerplatey not about the Vancover restaurants specifically please change this

Ping when done Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:01, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Done, @OlifanofmrTennant. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:29, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

It’s still very surface level. Can this be expanded to be more about the Vancouver restaurants? Also the Quebec thing should be readded Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:39, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

@OlifanofmrTennant, even more has been added. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:42, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

"The Vancouver guide exclusively rates restaurants only within the city's limits." well duh... seems redundent

"For example, restaurants in places like Richmond, Whistler, Vancouver Island and the Okanagan Highland are not reviewed at this time" unnecassary this is about Vancouver not all of Canada Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 23:47, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

@OlifanofmrTennant, for your first point, Vancouver has a metro area, so it is correct to specify. I removed the other part. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:15, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Clarify that it excludes the metro Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 00:21, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

@OlifanofmrTennant, Done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:28, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Lead needs more links, maybe link a few of the restaurants in the lead? Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Done, @OlifanofmrTennant. History6042😊 (Contact me) 16:38, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

You should not use graphics on FLCs as they are transcluded they slow down the load time on the main page, please convert yours to a bolded "done" once this is done Support Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:43, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

SounderBruce

• The prose is missing an analysis of the selected restaurants and their context within the Greater Vancouver food scene. From a quick search, there seems to be plenty of coverage, so I'm not sure why this wasn't added before the nomination. Oppose on criteria 3(a) until this is addressed. SounderBruce 00:47, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

  @SounderBruce, I am not sure what you mean by analysis of the restaurants. List of Michelin-starred restaurants in Turkey passed so I would assume it has it, please point out where it is. History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:25, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

  • Simply put, the amount of prose dedicated solely to Vancouver (and not copied across all of these lists) is far too short. The Toronto list at least has a Criticism section that dives deeper into the local details; I wouldn't expect the same Criticism section to be added here, but rather more context, e.g. how representative the cuisines are relative to the rest of the scenes, the ages of the restaurants, how geographically spread out they are, etc. SounderBruce 01:44, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

    @SounderBruce, I will add more specifically about Vancouver's restaurants. History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:49, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

    Done, @SounderBruce, there is now much more info about the restaurants. History6042😊 (Contact me) 11:48, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

    @SounderBruce, repinging that more has been added. History6042😊 (Contact me) 14:23, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

    I'm still not seeing a real analysis. Just some choppy sentences that repeat basic facts and a whole paragraph that is just copied from an awards list, which isn't exactly needed here. I don't think this is of FL quality. SounderBruce 04:14, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

IntentionallyDense

Source Review

• Sources are appropriately reliable for the topic
• Add wikilinks to Vancouver Magazine, otherwise formatting is consistent
• Add author for [5] and [6]
• I did a source spot check and found no issues.

Please ping me when you have fixed the above issues. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 06:07, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

@IntentionallyDense, done, thank you. History6042😊 (Contact me) 11:38, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

pass for the source review. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 17:58, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Comments from TheDoctorWho

• Add {{Use Canadian English|date=April 2025}}
• Italicize Vancouver Magazine in the lead
• If the guide "exclusively rates restaurants within the city's limits" is it necessary to include "Vancouver" in front of all the neighborhoods in the table?
• Italian fusion is a MOS:BLUESEA issue
• References 2, 3, and 6, are WP:DUPREF's that can be combined
• References 10 and 11 are missing archives
• Reference 11 has a SHOUTING issue

Not much else to say here, nice work! TheDoctorWho (talk) 18:52, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

@TheDoctorWho, all  Done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:16, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Happy to support! TheDoctorWho (talk) 20:57, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:28, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Hey man im josh via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC) [7].

---

List of Michelin-starred restaurants in Moscow

Nominator(s): History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:36, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I think it is similar to other Michelin FLs. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:36, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Drive-by comment You say "It was stated by a Michelin spokesperson" but do not give a year or timeline. Mattximus (talk) 16:26, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Fixed. History6042😊 (Contact me) 18:00, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

IntentionallyDense

Source review

I will do the source review for this article starting with formatting then checking reliability and then doing a source spot check. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 19:48, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

• Wikilink Reuters to match formatting of other sources
• Remove www from finedininglovers
• Dates are inconsistent
• Since you have retrieved dates for most of the sources it would make sense to add that for the others
• Add date for [8]
• Sources seem appropriately reliable for the topic
• Spot checks all verify information

Ping when done. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 22:05, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

@IntentionallyDense,  Done History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:18, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Pass for the source review. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 04:45, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

OlifanofmrTennant

• The location row is redudent as the article title names Moscow
• Why is "Fine Dining Lovers" reliable?
• In Ref 2 "MICHELIN" should in lowercase
• What does "Modern" mean?
• There is little in the lead about the Moscow specific list
• Michelin Guide is linked in both the first and second sentences, it's linked a third time in the last paragraph.
• The last sentence is a bit confusing did you mean "could resume Russian activities, but it was too early"
• Moscow is linked for the first time in the final paragraph, move this link to the first mention in the opening sentence

Ping me when done Olliefant (she/her) 01:09, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

@OlifanofmrTennant, Done, except modern is how the restaurants are described on their websites and there is already a full paragraph about how it got shut down. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:21, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Clarify the month the spokesperson made the comment Olliefant (she/her) 14:32, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

@OlifanofmrTennant, done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:17, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Support Olliefant (she/her) 22:32, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Comments from TheDoctorWho

• Wikilink Moscow in the first sentence rather than the third paragraph
• Add a comma after "However" in the second sentence
• "the last year that the Guide was released" - either decapitalize guide, since the usage here could meet the textbook definition OR italicize as a shortened reference to Michelin Guide.
• "In March 2022, it was stated by a Michelin spokesperson that the company could resume Russian activities, as it was too early to make a decision." doesn't make much sense, looking at the source is it supposed to read something closer to "In March 2022, it was stated by a Michelin spokesperson that it was too early to make a decision if Russian activities would ever resume"? Doesn't have to be that wording exactly, just a suggestion.
• Michelin Guide is italicized in Ref 2 but not 6, this should be consistent one way or the other.
• Link Michelin Guide in Ref 2
• Refs 1, 2, and 6 are missing archives.

TheDoctorWho (talk) 21:31, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

@TheDoctorWho, done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:39, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Nick work, Happy to support! TheDoctorWho (talk) 21:59, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:28, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Hey man im josh via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC) [9].

---

2025 Asian Winter Games medal table

Nominator(s): Arconning (talk) 12:29, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

A non-Olympic list for now, though it's still a medal table! Ping me if you have comments, will probably reply a few days later. Loved these games so much, had to start a new article about it. Arconning (talk) 12:29, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "A total of 1,275 athletes representing 34 National Olympic Committees (NOCs) participated" - these are not the Olympics, so is this accurate?
• "Among the NOCs that participated, Bhutan,[2] Cambodia,[3] and Saudi Arabia made their Asian Winter Games debut" - first five words are redundant
• "most gold medals won for an individual at the games" => "most gold medals won by an individual at the games"
• "The medal table is based on information provided by the International Olympic Committee" - is it.....?
• "they are listed alphabetically by their IOC country code" - there are no country codes in the table -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:44, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude Addressed all the comments, as the Olympic Council of Asia is under the auspices of the IOC, they still utilize NOCs. Arconning (talk) 12:16, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:58, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

IntentionallyDense

Source review

I will do the source review for this article starting with formatting then checking reliability and then doing a source spot check. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 19:48, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

• Would add retrieved dates for those that don't have them as the majority do.
• Add website and author for [10]
• I can't access [11] but just wanted to double check there was no author
• Spot checks all verified information

Ping when done. Great work! IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 22:14, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

@IntentionallyDense I believe I'm done, removed the second citation though. Kuensel source does not have an author listed. Arconning (talk) 16:01, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Pass for the source review. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 19:48, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Hey man im josh

I found nothing to crticize or recommend, good job! Suppport. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:27, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:28, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.